Monday, October 26, 2009
Testimony of a Husband’s Death
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
The Embrace
As if it were a vacuum
a single instant swallows me
and I am in the bag
with the rust
of all other floors
in assembly.
I look out, from a long corridor
from where the look has no beginning,
each shape that makes your face,
A prism.
You and I, clasped in everlasting embrace,
are made eternal by being far away.
Sunday, October 11, 2009
From Where We Are
Friday, October 2, 2009
u-1 and other poems
A Viennese bunk bed
A lone cry beside you
Could not keep you
From tangling toward the door
The pillow, as it folds, at the nape
Is wet with a flattened face
All the people of the day
Dissolve with it
And in the semi-empty bedroom
The only things left
Are the ones I couldn’t have.
U-1
Corked by the people we are
The faces we have grown into
And decided to keep
In the bedrooms
We’ve deserted
Traces of sleeping shoulders,
There is a pile of wrappers
That haven’t been taken out yet.
The pieces of ourselves
Crammed into bread crumbs
Of a devoured loaf
Are left in these places.
Soon the rooms that contain them
Will be over run
And lived by them.
Orphean Altitudes
You are not far behind me.
You appear to me still,
In airplane dreams
I wake up
mid-ocean
above the ground
we’ve been erased from.
Invisibility is a most certain death.
Faces in a Rear View
For Phil, On the Anniversary of his Death
Your footsteps
Coming upon my door
The greatest of your secrets, revealed
Just before it’s opened.
My mouth, eclipsed
Then wholed by a bewailed breath
Knowing the sounds taken in
Are lived by them.
When I come up,
Against your forehead
Your militiant order
To be seen by your battered eye
Vague with knowness
Something like an august arm
Abasing closeness.
A year later,
There are empty sock drawers
In the walk-in,
There are antique bicycles
In the basement
That are getting older.
On the thought of living
I wonder,
How is it, that this room
Has become embalmed
With you absence.
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Faces in a Rear View
“The room is worn out; it is as if people have been coming here since the beginning of time.”
The middle of the room
Smelling of dust,
The pattern of an eye, repeats.
Bare walls like these
Have too much between them,
Too many heartbreaking corners
Made human, by virtue
Of being touched.
So the rubbed down knob
And the painted latch,
Moldings of men
Wear away, into slowness
Pass away like smoke.
*
From the hallway mirror
A face enters from a tomb
Finding itself,
Hanging from a peculiar hook,
Feels alone by the evening.
Night, (all consuming) falls
A habit of recession
Alike to each one before.
Yesterday is remembered.
*
“Now I can no longer see anything but the pallor of my face, with its deep eye-sockets, buried in the dusk, and my mouth full of silence which is gently but surely stifling and destroying me.”
For days to multiply:
The next imaginable face
Glanced from a dark window.
There is only one’s voice
Carouseled sounds
On a flat, languid tongue
Vaguely human.
The exaggerated sunset
Is a small knick of death
Is a captivity
Stripped and diminished
Wandering to a dangerous lust
For a return.
“I try to discover the purpose of her gestures, but they escape me… I have a feeling that, in spite of the wall, my body is leaning toward her” (p.21-22).
“The body is the appearance that dictates your life.” – M.B
In the public square
where crowds spill
as if to be,
so utterly open
bodies give up
their plurality.
Behind a locked door
faces and gestures
come closer
to their curious feature.
The muted sun,
coming through a window
onto stockings
worn at the toes
A little pure flesh
small enough for a kiss
Visible at the instant
of being known.
Onto the face:
The site of all nudity
Beneath its pipes of bone
tectonically separating
to be the gap
of your mouth
Between parted lips
there is no location.
Friday, September 4, 2009
Distant Cities
Friday, July 10, 2009
Also, at the Point of Happening
Postcard no. 2
Postcard no. 1
Phone call From Riga
Friday, June 19, 2009
Tossed up by the Ankles
Timeline
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Comizi D’Amore
Thoughts on Pier Paolo Pasolini’s documentary “Comizi D’Amore”:
In this documentary Pasolini travels around Italy interviewing people on their position on the “sexual problem”. Mainly focusing on questions of sex education, marriage/ divorce, chastity, machismo, sexual abnormalities, and so on. His technique is less of the Kinsey model, that is to say, less scientific and statistical. Pasolini engages with his audience, conversing in such away that the nature and beliefs of the people interviewed are revealed. He is more socially aware of the conflict people have with their own ideas. However, that is not to say that there isn’t an organized agenda.
Pasolini interviews people from different regions of different ages and economic background, the aim being to paint a fuller picture of Italy as it stands for the individual and the whole. The question of completeness than becomes issue. What about the people who were not interviewed, those who remained silent? If it were possibly to interview everyone, could we reach a point of saturation of knowledge enough to educate an entire country? Pasolini recognizes this weakness, the limits of his own project. This I find is more satisfying that Kinsey’s sex surveys. The interview, in all its flaws is aware that it exists in conflict and uncertainty, its not idealistic. It opens the discussion so that each can extend their own beliefs further than was originally possible. Unfortunately it also makes it so a resolution or synthesis may never be reached.
So what is the sex problem in 1960’s Italy, what is the diagnosis? By the end of the documentary I am concerned less and less by these questions. Instead I am more focused on the looks of the people as they speak, their shyness or conviction. It brings my attention to each individual voice as they formulate their own opinions on sex.
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Lorca: Poetry and History
After leafing through the latest issue of the New Yorker, I have developed some thoughts of Spanish poet Fredric Garcia Lorca. The article writes form the political angle and debate around his death and grave excavation.
After returning to Spain in the early 1930’s to a country that was deeply trenched in civil war between the Republicans and the Nationalists. Lorca, a “visible figure with known Republican sympathies” had reached a level of celebrity that kept him on Nationalist radar. Lorca was known to socialize with other popular figures such as Salvador Dali and a personal favorite of mine, director Luis Bunel. He was also openly gay, which is suggested to be further cause for his death.
A military rebellion in the summer of 1936, lead by general/ dictator Francisco Franco resulted in Lorca’s execution, death by firing squad. It was later learned that his body and several others were dumped in an unmarked grave in Andalusia.
The article addresses the interesting political discordance around his exhumation, namely on the unresolved issues of the civil war. Still today Spain has either historical amnesia, or is unwilling to come to terms. For me it raises some interesting questions of the relationship between art, and history.
How can law and the judicial process help the historiography of a celebrated poet? And on the questions of ownership, at what point does the image of the poet become processed by the public, does that give them access to the physical remains? How is the excavation of Lorca metonymic for the unresolved conflict of the Spanish civil war?
His excavation is an attempt to confront a Spanish past and rewrite history. In my opinion it emphasizes most importantly, how a poet can be symbolic of what political philosopher David Crocker calls “an emblem of a contested past.”
Crimes of the Human Form
Enclosing on the Historic
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Louise Malle
There are many obvious reasons why someone could be effected by this movie, its existential, its dark, its French, but there was something beyond these elements that I found striking. Malle manages to forge an unfamiliar sense of the everyday. Objects are dissociated, people watching from cafĂ©’s are more than ever, obviously strangers, without history.
There are moments when the camera closes in on the face, and you can see, deeply the heavy mascara of the 1960’s cosmetic. But what I find so terribly sad about these moments is the incredible lack of intimacy, as if the gaze were never met with an actual look. As if you could feel the desperation of clutching for a lover’s arm and at the same time feel as if its already wriggled away.
Still, no matter how personal the camera gets to the expression, I am pulled through the movie as if I were its shadow. Somehow watching makes me even more isolated. There is little interiority from Ronet’s character. Our impressions of him are his basic confessions, his routine, but most importantly his relation to the things which surround him, the space he occupies. In this, I think Malle does something genius. There are no over worked settings, spared of any elaborate design. Its Ronet’s awkwardness, his inability to take possession, to really hold something that fully expresses his solitude.
Basic Information
My favorite new French director originally studied political science at the Sorbonne. Although he filmed in the time of Godard and Truffaut, he’s not associated with elements of the nouvelle vague aesthetic. Malle made his first feature “Elevator to the Gallows” at age 24, going on to make “The Lovers” whose controversial sexual content became judicial when taken to the Supreme Court. Believed to be too obscene the theater was fined $2500, but because the court could not agree on a definition of obscenity the charges were dropped. Malle made 20 feature films in his life; but my favorite and most recent obsession is “The Fire Within” (Le Feu Follet). Made in 1963 staring Maurice Ronet as suicidal alcoholic Alain Leroy. Based on the novel by Pierre Drieu La Rochelle. It is often regarded as his best from his earlier work because it’s the most autobiographical.
Interesting facts about the film:
- Malle made Ronet loose 45 pounds for the role.
- The wardrobe for the movie was all of Malle’s own clothes. Malle wished he could have played the part, but admitted in an interview in 1992 that he is a terrible actor. As a result of this particular physiological obsession he was particularly hard on Ronet during filming.
- Louise Malle worked with a close team of friends, whose particular specialties became part democratic and collaborative effort. Le Feu Follet was an entirely different project and became a solitary expression and documentation of his emotional history. He wrote the script alone.
- The Pistol was also Malle’s property.
- Ronet’s scene at the dinner party was shot so many times, the editor, Suzanne Baron chose the best takes from each of the camera shots to mirror the choppy inconstancy of his mental break-down.
- Similar to director Vittorio De Sica, Mallle preferred to use non-actors to get closer to the purity of the moment. But after months of unsuccessful casting he finally decided on Ronet because he best resembled the novel’s protagonist French Surrealist poet and friend of La Rochelle.
Linguistics
Where everything passes through
A hysterical smile
An accursed, sinister burn
In constant interaction
With the dramatic labor
Of the thing described
Emerging
Out of the mastery
Of presence
The narrative, as it tends to
Convulses
To the sense of life
Exhibits
All you are incapable
Striking upon language
Tearing as the body does
Taking on volume
The cavalry tongue
Rebelliously interprets
Reluctant to correspond
Bears within itself
Cold war fictions.
New Wave inspires me
Godard and a Photo booth
Imagine something like this:
You are getting out of the pool
Your shoulders tilting from the weight
Of your serpent torso
My sopping feet are the first thing
You see at the tile’s edge.
At this moment you think
About our canvas bodies
In a blanket canal
Or maybe
The two of us are on the roof
Where the spider web silk
Comes down like streamers.
We take a pause
To find out where they come from.
You point above the next row of roofs
I look beyond your finger
Past where I can no longer see
Maybe there is a spider there
Maybe that’s where it begins.
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
Francis Bacon
- Introspective
Where the sense
Of the everyday withdraws
To the inexperience of knowing you
Revaluating permanently
In lamination
As I see you
As you see me
Physicality becomes conquest
A stimulated apparition of anatomy
A mute exterior
Striving against.
- Faced With Being Lived
An excess of genre
Besieged by mania
Declared by provocations
Is fragile and desperate
To a recover a center
Where neither of us are between
Or concentric
But our own phantoms
Filling with our own torment
Under dying
Of absolute value
Taken in the brutality
And the powerlessness
Of being lived.
- Flinching
A rigid need for resemblance
A hazardous echo
Transforms into the blending
Of two referents.
Changing direction
Does not pursue
Or dictate
The chance of a natural logic.
It’s enough to be moving
Pulling off the shelves
The apparent sense
Of being caught in one’s own circle
Of being in consequence.
- Picture Frame
What the canvas gives
To the form
Is the anguish
And the heritage
Of weakness
Too great to facilitate
A crude strength
For the manner
Of movement.
The parts concealed
The parts constant
And lacking
Weary, or convinced
That dimension
Is a place
We can’t fully fit.
- Portrait
The controlled world of the face
On itself, invents a scale
To spin the imposing others
Into something restless
(like an expression)
who knows its fallible instincts
and hesitates.
at the moment of a photograph
when it’s given
something to be called by
like all other pictures
immediately regrets being
rendered from what is fundamentally invisible
to being named.
This day for the past four years
‘05
Today is somebody’s birthday
I remember telling you that on a field
Coming face to face with the worst
Just then, I left the comfort of these walls
To be my own open space
Reminds me of going into fall
Perpetual
Heavily memorialized.
‘06
It was an afternoon in the park
Crowded by lazy feet
The rim of benches
From where
Headphones
Hallow
Hairlines
Circling the pavement strip
Muscles and heels coming through
And disappear
Behind the width of a tree
Captured by something prosthetic
Like earphones from the lobes
Hair staunchy
I had seen him before
On the slopped path
Bound by the reservoir
Pulling from the mass of people
I tried to follow
Those fingers clutching the black paint fence
Buildings peered on the water
The only distinction from strange bodies
Wrapping from the bend
Following direction feet
Of magnificent space growing in benevolent gaps between us
Knowing before the first step
I had already lost him
Roped in among them
Being taken
‘07
At the Beach in Varna, Bulgaria
the feral nakedness of children
No pretending here
The shame of a pre-adolescent chest
Or swimmer bottoms
Covering parts private with age.
The etiquette of space teaches us
To be in control of seeing
‘08
Airplane to Argentina
Memory has a plea for opulence
Held by the sincere belief that
It’s always somewhere else
As restless as an airplane both quickly moving
Nothing to keep of it
After it dies.
I do my Best thinking in the shower
Bedroom Deliverance
Some promises to the world
Delivered
When you get to the ocean
Turn around,
Look into the camera
Where else is there to run to?
The view from the river: Ezar
Bandits of bear limbs
Climbing out of rocks
The skin holds the water
And keeps it there.
The cure and the oblique
Overlook more raking paper.
Titling toward the web
Where spiders make their own progress.


